Re: Need 1 more vote for Image_IPTC class
| From: | Wolfram Kriesing | Date: | Tue, 08 Apr 2003 10:49:19 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Need 1 more vote for Image_IPTC class | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-15019@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
i think there are some people who are more comfortable with OO-interfaces. If one doesnt like it one doesnt have to use it. I am not saying this is not adding overhead. But it's still one's decision to use it. It's there, but it's not a replacement! So everyone is free to decide either to use it or not. -- Wolfram ... opensource @ vision:produktion ... http://opensource.visionp.de ... translating template engine .... http://sf.net/projects/simpletpl ... authentication system .... http://sf.net/projects/authUnfortunately exactly that is beginning to happen with the CS clashes between PHP and PEAR. As a result it seems PEAR will always have to wrap any functionality it takes from php native function/classes.Why? If a class does nothing except wrap lower-level functions, why in the world would there be any need for such a class? You are adding pure overhead, and as an added bonus you make my eyes bleed.