Re: PEAR/PECL and Namespaces

On Sun, 2003-04-13 at 01:04, l0t3k wrote: > hey all, > > i'm working on an OO based extension for PHP5 which at some point i'd like > to submit to PECL. since extensions now can declare their own namespaces, id > like to get a basic discussion going about how we select/reserve namespaces > for extensions. or is it that PECL code is not necessarily considered a part > of the PEAR namespace heirarchy. > in my particular case, the extension implements functionality already in > PEAR, but i'd also like to hear people's ideas about the general case. Why not make a regular PEAR package with C code? All you really need to do is follow the naming standards for classes and such. Hey, if it implements the same stuff as some existing package written in PHP, the C implementation could even replace it (or parts of it). - Stig