Re: HTML_Page package reprised

OK, sorry... I got the impression from Adam that there were other packages. However, on looking through the packages, I find that this seems to be the only one of his. Sorry about that. I know HTML_Processor is orphaned, bit it's not Adam's work, so if I want to pick it up, I need to get permission from the author. Other than that, it seems that all packages have been moved. Next time I'll make sure I know what I'm talking about before making a general statement like that. Klaus ----- Original Message ----- From: "Martin Jansen" <mj@php.net> To: "Klaus Guenther" <klaus@capitalfocus.org> Cc: "pear-dev" <pear-dev@lists.php.net> Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 10:28 AM Subject: Re: [PEAR-DEV] HTML_Page package reprised > On Wed Apr 23, 2003 at 04:4756AM +0200, Klaus Guenther wrote: > > The HTML_Page class was removed from the repository because Adam > > Daniel couldn't maintain it, so it never got moved to the pear/ cvs > > repository. I got the OK from him to take over some of his classes, > > and I've rewritten the class to make it XHTML compliant. Now I know > > many dropped classes were still in the php4/pear/ branch until > > December. Can I simply make a release of those orphaned packages with > > myself as the mainainter? Do I need to get approval here first? After > > all, they were already approved. I realize that some of them probably > > are no longer needed because a new package has taken their place, and > > in that case I'm not going to bother working on them. But where that > > is not the case? > > Concerning HTML_Page I see no problem. But can you make a list of the > other orphaned packages you are talking about? > > -- > - Martin Martin Jansen > http://martinjansen.com/ > > -- > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php