Re: New package (PECL) proposal: IBM Websphere MQ (mqseries)- REPOST

> Martin Jansen wrote: >> On Thu May 15, 2003 at 12:1136PM +0200, Holger Burbach wrote: >> >>>On Donnerstag, 15. Mai 2003 11:57, Alan Knowles wrote: >>> >>>>+1 here - I thought we had a lower barier of entry for PECL.. (as it's >>>>harder :) .. >>> >>>Is there really a lower barrier for PECL packages? The PEAR >>> documentation >>>refers only to PEAR packages proposals. So I thought the same rules >>> apply to >>>PECL packages... >> >> >> Right. >> > I think its much more harder to get 5 votes for a thing written in C > then in a scripting language, because the reviewers must have better > skills to able to review a PHP extension. So maybe it is necessary to define seperate rules for PECL package proposals. Well, just a thought... So Michael and I will keep begging for votes. ;-) Regards, Holger