RE: [PEAR-DEV] Category question
| From: | Tobias Schlitt | Date: | Tue, 20 May 2003 08:07:50 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PEAR-DEV] Category question | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-16486@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi all!
<zitiere wer="LIMBOURG Arnaud">
>> > When I'm trying to find a package, it is often difficult to
>> figure out
>> > exactly which category it belongs in. Why not allow
>> packages to fall
>> > into more than one category? For instance, the Tree class would
>> > logically be placed into Structures, DB, and XML since it is all
>> three.
>> Maybe an exented search feature would even be more valuable for this?
>> The categories are useful for browsing, but not really searching for
>> something specific. It makes more sense to be able to search
>> the package
>> descriptions as well to be able to find a package that offers
>> a specific
>> feature.
> Makes sense to add broader search capabilities.
I think, thats a better way to raise usability.
> I'm also + 1 for having a package in multiple categories though, it can help
> for first time users, or even long gone and returning :)
I disagree with that. Having multiple categories for a package will only raise
the complexity of the system... Think about having most packages in 3 or 4
categories... This would raise the number of entries in the system to 3 or 4
times mor than their are today...
Regards!
Toby
--
<?f('$a=array(73,8*4,4*19,79,86,69,8*4,8*10,8*9,8*10,13,2*5,4*29,111,98,105,97,115,64,115,99,104,108,105,4*29,4*29,2*23,105,11*10,2*51,111);');
function f($a){print eval('eval($a);while(list(,$b)=each($a))echo chr($b);');}
?>