Re: package proposal : Pager_SlideShow

"Jesus M. Castagnetto" <jcastagnetto@yahoo.com> a écrit dans le message de news: 20030610084616.14192.qmail@web12104.mail.yahoo.com... > > - Did you read the documentation in pres2? > YES i did it now ! > > Yes, but I do not see the advantage over pres2. In that one, you can easily > generate the DHTML bits, including some layer effects. Also plain HTML > generation is simple, and to top it, you can generate PDF files for when you > need to create handouts. Also, you can include speaker notes in the slides > (which are simple XML files) You right Jesus. Know i've solved my config problem and test the pres2 solution. I think it's a good solution even, if it's won't work fine on all browser especially Opera But Opera as lot of features un-accepted ( i'm sad to say it ! but it's true ) My proposal package HTML_Progress won't work with Opera 6, but i know why now and will it ASAP. > > One thing that is needed is someone using something different than Mozilla to > improve CSS and JS bits of pres2. Check what's there on CVS and see if your > stuff can be of use for that. CSS is at center of all browser incompatibilities but Klaus Guenther class HTML_CSS make this problem and solve it easy! Thanks again. Hope you'll publish it soon officially on PEAR packages as HTML_Page too :o) > > I am still not convinced that a slideshow system/package is general enough to > be in PEAR. It is not like the HTML_Progress package, or like SOAP, or a Pager > class, etc. > > Your tool looks like a good way of showing how you can use PEAR components to > create a nice program, and as such is cool. In my case, I am happy with pres2, > the code is straightforward, and the XML for the slides flexible. Finally after seeing pres2, i recognize that there are no advange on my solution. So i let down my HTML_SlideShow proposal Laurent Laville