Re: Package proposal: Unique

From: Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 20:40:55 +0000
Subject: Re: Package proposal: Unique
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-17729@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
> Yes, I'm sure. You *never* call Unique::instance() and thus cannot set the > static variable within it. > Here is another fun part from factory(): > [php] > $this->Db = new Unique; > [/php] > This will probably *overwrite* DB's instance. Not sure as I didn't run this, but > still... factory() method is called only once and after calling factory() $instance will contain Unique object if u dont see that, its your problem :) > The benchmarks clearly show that you'd be better using native MySQL functions. :] yeah, sure :) u can also code your web applications in C ... :) > > it has dedbugging queries / error handling features that fit my needs, > > what is wrong with that ? > Nothing is wrong with that. :] great ! > > okay so could u explain me, how this should be done ? > > thx for help > Dunno. Last time I implemented this, I just stored the tokens in session. Thus > no need to access database, no need to do separate GC... sounds like a good idea but is sessiondata locked ? i mean when user clicks few times on "submit" button so the 2nd request/click will wait until 1st is executed ? they use the same session adding uniq_id to sessiondata in 1st execute, will be seen in 2nd execute ?

« previous php.pear.dev (#17729) next »