Re: Package-proposal: HTML_Calendar
| From: | Harry Fuecks | Date: | Sat, 09 Aug 2003 18:18:59 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Package-proposal: HTML_Calendar | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-19451@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Stefan,
So you can see what's going on, have made the proposal for Date_Calendar already here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear- dev&m=106045306402489&w=2
All the best,
Harry
On Sat, 09 Aug 2003 16:17:16 +0200, Stefan Neufeind <Neufeind@speedpartner.de> wrote:
On 9 Aug 2003 at 16:08, Harry Fuecks wrote:At some point soon will submit a collection of classes I've got for building calendar data structures (i.e. absolutely no output is generated). This would be for the Date namespace. **Using** it to build some HTML looks something like this;[...]By treating calendars purely as data structures, it's possible to build any output you like from them (e.g. WML).Totally agreed. I see such a class (Date_Calendar?) would be a good solution. This way Martin could use Date_Calendar if he needs real "raw" data or use HTML_Calendar if he needs some preformated version for easier handling. Agreed everybody?Stefan, if you're prepared to wait a couple of weeks (the code isn't in PEAR format right now) I'll submit it then HTML_Calendar could become a class which "sits on top" for building output. Drop me a line on hfuecks@phppatterns.com if you don't hear anything.How long do you think it will take? My proposal: We'll wait e.g. 2 or 3 weeks for Date_Calendar to show up and then release a HTML_Calendar depending on it. Okay? Please keep me posted ... Stefan