Re: Re: Pear documentation

On Tue, 09 Oct 2001 17:21:17 +0200, Tomas V.V.Cox wrote: >Martin Jansen wrote: >> >> On Tue, 09 Oct 2001 15:26:05 +0200, Tomas V.V.Cox wrote: >> >> >In what areas are you interested in? DocBook would be the best format, >> >but plain text or html are also good. Any way please go ahead :-), >> >> Well, at least we should concentrate on one format. My favourite is >> Docbook, since you can generate a bunch of other formats from it. >> > >First we should concentrate on generating doc :-). My recommendation is: >"Seriously think on using DocBook, but if don't want it, rethink it and >if finally don't want it choose other "on-line displayable" format like >plain text or html". Is it a good approach? But how do you want to publish all this different formats on the PEAR website? If we want to have a centralised solution for the documentation, we'll have to conclude on one standard IMO. - Martin