Re: PEAR_DelegateOwner
| From: | Martin Jansen | Date: | Sun, 16 Nov 2003 09:27:53 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PEAR_DelegateOwner | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-23673@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sat Nov 15, 2003 at 05:2528PM -0500, LingWitt@insightbb.com wrote:
> >>Usually we do use PEAR::raiseError() / $this->raiseError() for that.
> >>Did
> >>I miss something?
> >
> >For methods that don't exist, I'm calling trigger_error so that it is
> >more in line with undefined methods treated by PHP.
> >For the others, I will use the PEAR scheme.
>
> This was premature. I only use PEAR's raiseError.
>
> Is the following error reporting to aggressive?
Well, usually PEAR code should not die(), but leave the decision to the
programmer. However in this situation die()'ing looks reasonably for
me. Would be cool to hear some other opinions.
--
- Martin Martin Jansen
http://martinjansen.com/