Re: validate URL

# mj@php.net / 2003-12-04 18:32:08 +0100: > On Thu Dec 04, 2003 at 04:3505PM +0100, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 09:29:29 -0600 > > Paul M Jones <pmjones@ciaweb.net> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 4, 2003, at 9:22 AM, Arnaud Limbourg wrote: > > > > > > > Nope. > > > > > > > > it means valid values are http, https, ftp > > > > > > > > the ? is for 0 or 1 which matches http or https. > > > > > > Which means that mailto:, news://, and gopher:// are > > > not valid? > > > > Those are valid URI (afair :). This function should valid widely > > called urls. But it should take care of ftps? as well ;) > > IMO the method shouldn't be too strict about the protocol. Accepting > everything that only contains characters and nothing else sounds like a > good idea to me. not to me: svn+ssh is one of schemes used by Subversion (subversion.tigris.org). -- If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html