Re: SQL->XML mapping

From: Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 16:41:26 +0000
Subject: Re: SQL->XML mapping
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-24694@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
<hans@appliedsec.com> wrote : > >> I have some simple Java code on that one, can come up w/ the PHP version so >> you >> can then use it (cannot promise to maintain it due to time limitations). It >> does the SQL identifiers/values -> XML identifere/values mapping and the >> converse. I have not tackled the generation of XML Schemas from SQL Schemas. >> One thing that would make either (XML docs from resultsets, and XML Schemas >> from SQL Schemas) easier would be to have the Database absetraction layers >> (or >> related packages/classes) provide some meta-info (table, db, column type, >> etc.), and have a set of predefined SQL types that can be easily mapped to >> XML >> types, sort of what the JDBC ResultSetMetaData class provides in Java. >> >> >> > Yeah, one of the primary reasons we created Creole (the JDBC-like DB > abstraction used by Propel) was to provide a very complete (organized > into classes) metadata system. It's more closely related to the > Hibernate metadata classes than to JDBC metadata classes. Of course, I > don't know how to do ResultSetMetaData in PHP (would be nice!), but we > can do pretty good discovery of full table info using SQL queries. IMO > the Creole metadata API is easier to use than JDBC anyway (at the cost > of being slightly less all-encompassing). > > Creole also uses a unified type system based on the JDBC types -- > primarily in order to support the XML <-> SQL <-> DB MetaData mapping > stuff needed by Propel. I've chatted breifly w/ Lukas about this > stuff. MDB (at least MDB2) also has some defined types, and hopefully > some of this metadata stuff can find its way into MDB2/3 or an extension > to MDB. > > I'll also take a look at this standard, as it would be nice to use a > standard for Propel, if appropriate. Of course the goal behind Propel > isn't so much to provide the kitchen sink DB_Schema, and in fact I'd be > very interested in using a "standard" soolution (DB_Schema, e.g.). Propel looks very promising/interesting. It would be nice indeed if it could become more "standard" and use DB_Schema. My main concern for now with this project is its requirements for PHP5. At the moment, I see that as a limitation. Bertrand Mansion Mamasam

« previous php.pear.dev (#24694) next »