Re: [PEPr] Comment on Networking::Net_Cyrus

From: Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 03:39:14 +0000
Subject: Re: [PEPr] Comment on Networking::Net_Cyrus
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-25654@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Excuse my english. Yes it can be done, but why? (why a backend infraestructure must be done if the only difference I see is a dependency on Net_IMAP?) I Think I can instantiate Net_IMAP as a private object instead of using inheritance if it is a problem. Can you tell me what problem do you see? Thanks! Please, Can you tell me what have you in mind? Maybe I'm missing something. Quoting PEPr <pear-sys@php.net>: > > Jan Schneider (http://pear.php.net/user/yunosh) has commented on the proposal > for Networking::Net_Cyrus. > > Comment: > > Do you see a chance to merge it with Net_Cyrus from Horde, letting the user > to select the "backend" being either Net_Socket or Net_IMAP? We would need to > use Net_IMAP as a proxy class instead of by inheritance, just like Net_Socket > is used in our class. > > Proposal information: > http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=23 > > -- > Sent by PEPr, the automatic proposal system at > http://pear.php.net > > > ------------------------------------------------- Mail enviado desde el CNBA http://www.cnba.uba.ar/

« previous php.pear.dev (#25654) next »