Re: [PEPr] Comment on Networking::Net_Cyrus
| From: | DESC) | Date: | Sat, 14 Feb 2004 03:39:14 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] Comment on Networking::Net_Cyrus | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-25654@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Excuse my english.
Yes it can be done, but why? (why a backend infraestructure must be done if the
only difference I see is a dependency on Net_IMAP?)
I Think I can instantiate Net_IMAP as a private object instead of using
inheritance if it is a problem. Can you tell me what problem do you see?
Thanks!
Please, Can you tell me what have you in mind? Maybe I'm missing something.
Quoting PEPr <pear-sys@php.net>:
>
> Jan Schneider (http://pear.php.net/user/yunosh) has commented on the proposal
> for Networking::Net_Cyrus.
>
> Comment:
>
> Do you see a chance to merge it with Net_Cyrus from Horde, letting the user
> to select the "backend" being either Net_Socket or Net_IMAP? We would need to
> use Net_IMAP as a proxy class instead of by inheritance, just like Net_Socket
> is used in our class.
>
> Proposal information:
> http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=23
>
> --
> Sent by PEPr, the automatic proposal system at
> http://pear.php.net
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------
Mail enviado desde el CNBA
http://www.cnba.uba.ar/