Re: getting a QA'ed package release

From: Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 21:13:30 +0000
Subject: Re: getting a QA'ed package release
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear.dev php.pear.qa 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-26101@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
From: "Marshall Roch" <pear-dev@exclupen.com> > Lukas Smith wrote: > > However I would like to encourage people to mail Pear QA if they are > > about to release a package so that we can have a quick look. Alot of the > > recent issues (like stable release below 1.0.0, not handling a BC break > > correctly) can be easily spotted. > > What about adding this to the release workflow, so that the new package > doesn't get released until checked by QA? The problem is that it adds unnecessary overhead while the advantages are rather low. We don't want a situation where a package sits there for a week while the QA team is processing other packages. This idea has been brought up before. While it is necessary in a corporate setting, it doesn't quite work for PEAR yet. The asynchronous QA-seal of approval suggested by Sérgio would be a good idea -- we already have talked about PFCs, which would require that. Klaus

« previous php.pear.dev (#26101) next »