Re: [PEPr] Proposal for HTTP::HTTP_Spider

Excellent Idea. I did one sometime but it was specific. Your class is generic. But I agree with Martin, if you wish to put your class at PEAR, would be better it divide the work with other packages like HTTP. Marcos Neves At 18:39 5/3/2004 +0100, Martin Jansen wrote:

On Fri Mar 05, 2004 at 05:2512PM -0000, PEPr wrote: Matthew Feinberg (http://pear.php.net/user/ketbra) proposes the new package HTTP::HTTP_Spider. You can find more detailed information here: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=29 There are a few technical issues with this package: * Why is PEAR.php included, if no feature that is provided by this file is used? * What purpose does the empty constructor serve? * There is a bunch of cool HTTP packages in PEAR, which should be used within HTTP_Spider. (E.g. HTTP_Request) * I do not think that it is a good idea to directly print debugging messages to stdout. Instead, Log should be used to faciliate a fine grained logging mechanism. --

    - Martin                           Martin Jansen
                            http://martinjansen.com/

-- PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php