RE: [PEAR-DEV] Error_Stack

From: Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:51:09 +0000
Subject: RE: [PEAR-DEV] Error_Stack
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-26478@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
When looking for other names it's always good to check out dictionary.com's Thesaurus :) http://thesaurus.reference.com/search?q=error PEAR_Boner, PEAR_Goof, PEAR_Slip-Up, PEAR_Muff and PEAR_Flub are all good ones ;) In all seriousness though it should be renamed and I definitely don't like the "PEAR_Errors" name. How often would PEAR_Error_Stack need to be called? If it's rare then who cares. If it's often then why not roll some checking functions into PEAR as was done with PEAR::isError? --Joe > -----Original Message----- > From: Jon Parise [mailto:jon@php.net] > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 11:41 AM > To: pear-dev@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PEAR-DEV] Error_Stack > > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:53:46AM -0500, Greg Beaver wrote: > > > It's looking like Error_Stack is liked. It will become a > part of the > > core PEAR package (unless a bunch of -1s come in), which > requires a name > > change. I feel PEAR_Error_Stack is both a little long and a little > > misleading (it's not a stack of PEAR_Errors). > > > > Does anyone have opinions on PEAR_ErrStack as a name? > > I'd be comfortable with 'PEAR_Errors', but I'm sure some > would feel that it would be (visibly) too similar to 'PEAR_Error'. > > -- > Jon Parise (jon@php.net) :: The PHP Project (http://www.php.net/) > > -- > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >

« previous php.pear.dev (#26478) next »