Re: [PEPr] 0 for Configuration::Config_Registry
| From: | Laurent Laville | Date: | Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:05:48 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] 0 for Configuration::Config_Registry | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-26517@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
"Pepr" <pear-sys@php.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
20040318015736.99324.qmail@pb12.pair.com...
>
> Alan Knowles (http://pear.php.net/user/alan_k) has voted 0 on the proposal
for Configuration::Config_Registry.
>
> Proposal information:
> http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=18
> Vote information:
> http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id=18&handle=alan_k
> Vye
>
> --
> Sent by PEPr, the automatic proposal system at $
> TAs19n^http://pear.php.net
Hello Alan,
i'm interresting by your comment, and want to know what do you have in mind
when you said :
"it also has a very poor API, with considerable methods having over 3
arguments. (It make code considerably more readably to use Assoc. arrays
there.)"
Please give me an example
Laurent