Re: Net_GameServerQuery

On 1 Apr 2004 at 14:34, Lukas Smith wrote: > Aidan Lister wrote: > > > After a couple of MAJOR reconstructions, I'm still struggling to find a way > > re-code my object for maximum flexibility... > > > > What I want to know: > > Should I call for votes now, leave the package as alpha (functional, > > useful)... or hold off another couple of months until I've found a way to > > redesign the object to accommodate a number of new features (data > > normalisation for one). > > well if enough people trust in your ability to fix the package and also > in your commitment in doing so, you should call for vote. afterall the > pear cvs is not only there to store perfect code, its also there to > assit in development of not yet perfect code :-) Agreed. Maybe you could put something up in cvs (while it was not yet voted upon), describe the changes needed and your ideas to pear-dev - and maybe somebody can give you a hand. You never know. Try it! PS: Imho data normalisation is nothing that takes several month - but maybe I'm over-optimistic :-) Kind regards, Stefan