Re: Re: [PEPr] Changes in proposal for RFC::Package naming, file naming and directory structure RFC

Hi Folks: On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 11:18:47AM +0800, Alan Knowles wrote: > > The idea is that having one Class per file, makes the code easier to > read in the long run. I guess it does, but some classes are small and moving them to a whole separate file is overkill. > From what I can see, the only argument against this, is that it would > invoke a performance penalty. - AFAIK this penalty would disappear when > using APC or another cache And how many pepople are using caches? I'd say the vast majority are not. But of course, the people who really care about performance, are. Also, as you and others have probably seen on internals, Zeev mentioned caching might not eliminate this problem. Thanks, --Dan -- T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y data intensive web and database programming http://www.AnalysisAndSolutions.com/ 4015 7th Ave #4, Brooklyn NY 11232 v: 718-854-0335 f: 718-854-0409