Re: Re: PEAR Meeting Agenda

I should have mentionned these are but examples of what can be discussed, not what *will* be discussed :) Arnaud. On 27 Apr 2004, at 8:16, Greg Beaver wrote:

Arnaud Limbourg wrote:

- Future of PEAR [ ] Roadmap : installer channels

I'm a little uncomfortable with this topic only because I can't attend the meeting, even in virtual fashion (I have more than 8 hours of rehearsal in a music festival that day starting right about when the meeting starts, and probably only high cost, low-speed internet in the hotel when I do have free time at night). I've been working HARD on both the concept and actual implementation of channels for months now, and discussing it on PEAR-Core. Channels are very well worked out. What really needs some serious discussion is the binary package distribution, pearweb re-factoring, and other things that haven't been discussed at all, such as implementing something resembling phrame's tasks on the road to application support. I have ideas about some of these things, but absolutely no quality time to sit down and talk about them until mid-May. I guess all I am saying is that since I will most likely be coding a lot of this stuff, I'd love to be in the loop on the decisions. If anyone has any bright ideas on how I could join in this through e-mail, that would be very helpful.