Re: PEAR Coding Standards

From: Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 21:39:07 +0000
Subject: Re: PEAR Coding Standards
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-28739@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Florent Monnier wrote:
Thorsten Suckow-Homberg a écrit :
This is not a good idea. Hust imagine you are opening a socket, ftp connections or anything else that works with a remote server... If the connection times out, there will be a warning...
You are right with this. But sometimes it would help more to get a PEAR_Error instead of ugly notices, warnings etc., for example when you want to access a specific function where the possibility is high that it is not installed on every server... Use function_exists("yadayada") instead of @yadayada, that was my main intention.
Indeed, on this point there is an error in your Image_Imagick proposal version alpha 0.2 (not just one but this thread is about '@'). In the function addUserFilter(), your include won't work in case that somefile.php does not exists if you strip the '@': I think you should put it back this way, for this code to work as you expect: $bCheckReq = @include_once 'somefile.php'; if (!$bCheckReq) {
    //error handling
} If you really want to remove all '@' from your code, perhaps another solution would be to use if(file_exists() && is_readable()) {/*safe include*/}
However, if you're relying on the include_path (as all PEAR packages do), then this won't work. file_exists only checks in the current working directory. You'd have to check everything in the include_path and that's something that include is already doing. Better to just use @ and check the return value. -- paperCrane <Justin Patrin>

« previous php.pear.dev (#28739) next »