Re: [PEPr] Comment on RFC::VersionNaming
| From: | Justin Patrin | Date: | Fri, 07 May 2004 16:43:29 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] Comment on RFC::VersionNaming | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-28972@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Pepr wrote:
Daniel Convissor (http://pear.php.net/user/danielc) has commented on the proposal for RFC::VersionNaming. Comment: The Stable Releases section says one should not have a "stable" state for releases pre 1.0.0. What about using "stable" for RC's of post 1.0.0 releases (e.g. 1.3.0RC3)? I don't have strong opinions on this. Proposal information: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=65IMHO an RC is not stable, even if it is an RC for something greater than 1.0.0. An RC implies that something needs to be tested before it is stable. -- paperCrane <Justin Patrin>