Re: [PEPr] Proposal finished PHP::PHP_Modules
| From: | Eric Gach | Date: | Fri, 21 May 2004 09:02:32 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] Proposal finished PHP::PHP_Modules | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-29483@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
PEPr wrote:
PEPr has automatically finished the proposal on PHP::PHP_Modules. Further details on the status of the proposal and the votes can be found here: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=68Okay... so since we haven't got much said about the name, I'd like to discuss a few other ideas. I'm still not wanting to rename this class to PHP_CodeLoader as previously suggested because it just doesn't give the class credit to what its true purpose is. PHP_AdvancedInclude and PHP_PartInclude don't even come near the class really. A few other ideas being tossed around are PHP_Modulation and PHP_ReloadableCode. I really don't like the PHP_ReloadableCode name due to it's generalization again. There doesn't seem to be that much rejection to the initial name of the class to make me want to just jump out and change it. However, I'd like to get this over with and resolved, so if anyone else has any opinions/ideas on the subject, please speak up. Hopefully we can get this resolved as fast as possible. Thanks, Eric Gach