[PEPr] Comment on RFC::Package naming, file naming and directory structure RFC

Stefan Neufeind (http://pear.php.net/user/neufeind) has commented on the proposal for RFC::Package naming, file naming and directory structure RFC. Comment: The RFC is fine from my side. I wondered if the demand for "Current packages are in general required to upgrade to get conformity." is really necessary and how it should be achieved - but if this sentence should stay I can live with it since you also mention that BC has priority over this regulation. Would this mean that upon a new major version a package not fully according to those standards needs to be renamed? Are there candidates? One minor thing under "Package classification": Does "size" really matter? :-) You're possibly thinking about things like Cache_Lite. But wouldn't this classification go under "functionality"? Imho size sounds a bit strange in this list. Proposal information: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=55 -- Sent by PEPr, the automatic proposal system at http://pear.php.net