Re: [PEPr] +1 for System::System_Mount
| From: | Ian Eure | Date: | Tue, 25 May 2004 21:12:32 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] +1 for System::System_Mount | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-29670@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 25 May 2004 11:37 am, PEPr wrote:
> Klaus Guenther (http://pear.php.net/user/thesaur) has voted +1 on the
> proposal for System::System_Mount.
>
> Proposal information:
> http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=67
> Vote information:
>
> http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id=67&handle=thesaur
>
> This vote is conditional. The condition is:
>
> As Martin said, a CS issue to clean up...
>
It's fixed in my local CVS.
> Also, though I'm not religious about it, shouldn't you put
> System_Mount_Entry into a separate file (System/Mount/Entry.php)? It's not
> like its going to slow this down that much.
>
I could, but I didn't think there was much point; the System_Mount class is
only 54 lines long, docblocks and all. It didn't seem worth it to split up,
but I have no problem doing that if the general concensus is that it's the
correct thing to do.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAs7bCxuUdPD6j2IMRAu2QAJ9XGgl188rOUZ+dOzqidTIiJzAoPwCgj+yl
LmRz3c7x2y1f5qu77Im8bM0=
=pTTR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----