[PEPr] Comment on QA::Core_Team_Vote

Lukas Smith (http://pear.php.net/user/lsmith) has commented on the proposal for QA::Core_Team_Vote. Comment: Actually I think its a good idea that everybody again give a bit information about themselves. Maybe we should better do so on a wiki? Anyways I am based in Berlin (that means I fall into CET timezone). I usually read all mails within 10 hours or so and reply within 24 hours. To dispell a common myth I am german and my mother tongue is german as well. I have been with PEAR since 2002 maintaining MDB[2] and LiveUser. I have been on pear-qa@ since its creation and actively take part in all discussions. I read all PEAR mailinglists (except for pear-webmasters@) actively. I try to visit atleast 2-3 PHP related conferences a year. I am also a member of the PEAR group :-) I use PEAR professionally inside my companies development framework. Beyond that I spend a fair share of my free time on PEAR. Generally I tend to be in the formal regulation camp, but I do think that alot of things are too hard to put into formal rules and instead common sense and trust should reign in those situations. I think PEAR QA should offer services to PEAR Dev but it needs to balance what it can actually sustain and where educating the the actual developers makes more long term sense. I think we should try to automate everything we manage to put into written regulations (like version naming etc) but we shouldnt apply automatic ways to determine relative quality (like bug count, meantime to fix, CVS commits, etc). Proposal information: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=77 -- Sent by PEPr, the automatic proposal system at http://pear.php.net