PEPr voting
| From: | Lukas Smith | Date: | Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:45:30 +0000 |
| Subject: | PEPr voting | ||
| Groups: | php.pear.dev | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-31906@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi,
I just wanted to clarify a few points that I think people might be forgetting about conditional votes.
Whenever we (the group) see conditional votes we first look if they were relevant in giving the proposal the required +5. If so we investigate if these conditions have been met.
This means:
1) if you are the proposer please inform the group about how you met those decisions directly after you register the package, otherwise we will just slowing down the process for you
2) if you think a package is unconditionally good then your +1 vote still matters even if the package already has the necessary +5 total if those votes include conditional votes
3) it might make sense to repeat conditions from previous voters, otherwise you will have no say in determining of the conditions have been met
regards,
Lukas Smith
smith@backendmedia.com
_______________________________
BackendMedia
www.backendmedia.com
berlin@backendmedia.com
Linn Zwoch Smith GbR
Pariser Str. 44
D-10707 Berlin
Tel +49 30 83 22 50 00
Fax +49 30 83 22 50 07