Re: [PEPr] Comment on Networking::Net_IDNA

From: Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 17:23:50 +0000
Subject: Re: [PEPr] Comment on Networking::Net_IDNA
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-32259@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
David Rech wrote: > I don't know whether it's hard to add PHP-builtin classes to your > extension - is it? > > So an OO-interface would be great here, while leaving the procedural > functions of the extension untouched for those who don't want to care > about or even don't know about the PEAR Foo_IDNA. > > This would not need any changes to Foo_IDNA beside cosmetic > considerations. Do we really need an OO-interface for these few functions? imho it's enough to offer an extension API and an Foo_IDNA-API where one can simply write an wrapper so the APIs shouldn't be tooooo different (not one of them expecting ISO-8859-5 and the other Utf-16 and such things) If I get an OO-interface implemented which doesn't cost too much I'm not oppsed but it's for me not the highest priority - I would use it mainly as "How do I write an internal class" but I don't see advatages for PHP.... johannes

« previous php.pear.dev (#32259) next »