Re: Wrong Versionname - Re: DB_NestedSet-1.3.5 (beta) Released.
| From: | Klaus Guenther | Date: | Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:44:00 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Wrong Versionname - Re: DB_NestedSet-1.3.5 (beta) Released. | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-32308@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
"Tobias Schlitt" <tobias@schlitt.info> wrote:
>
> Hi PEAR Announce! You wrote:
> > The new PEAR package DB_NestedSet-1.3.5 (beta) has been released at
>
> Should have been DB_NestedSet-1.3.5-betaX
Maybe I'm pedantic because I'm examining legal language. However, let's take
a look at the Group document.
"The version name is the final name of a version which consists of the
version number and an optional suffix."
And then later, it states merely:
"The state should always be added as a suffix unless the state is "stable"
(please note that as stated above the state "beta" is used for beta releases
and for release candidates). The suffix consists of the state followed by a
number which is incremented with every subsequent release with the same
state."
The level of urgency being "should" not "must", there is no obligation to add
the state to the version number. However, if the state is added, it must be
followed by a number. Therefore, imho, there is no need to bug people about
the missing state indicator.
Perhaps the Group could comment?