Re: Solution to PHP5 Exception debate (and possibly several future ones)
| From: | John Downey | Date: | Tue, 24 Aug 2004 23:09:06 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Solution to PHP5 Exception debate (and possibly several future ones) | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-32926@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
As well a +1
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 12:33:54 -0400, Greg Beaver <cellog@php.net> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think I may have a solution to the problem.
>
> First of all, Sergio's RFC applies to PHP5-only packages. All of my
> objections so far come primarily from the concern that we would be
> nailing down details before there is any actual code to verify that they
> will solve problems better.
>
> The solution: why not assign stability levels to RFCs just as we do to
> packages?
>
> Just because an RFC is accepted does not mean it has to suddenly become
> absolutely rigid and unchanging. Assign a stability of beta to the RFC,
> meaning that no package that conforms to the RFC may be a higher
> stability than beta (or assign alpha for the same reason). Once there
> is some experience implementing the RFC and the advantages and problems
> are truly understood, it can be either upgraded to stable, or fixed and
> then tested further.
>
> If the RFC is implemented in stable packages and a serious problem is
> found, we are simply screwed.
>
> For any major change of this sort, it is always best to be firm but
> flexible, and this is definitely an area that QA could help with
> (ensuring packages conform to the changing RFC, and that they aren't
> more stable than the RFC that they use).
>
> Any necessary changes can be voted on just the same way the original RFC
> was voted on.
>
> Greg
>
> --
> PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
--
John Downey
http://www.catdevnull.net