Re: PEAR_ErrorStack renaming question

Greg Beaver wrote: >By this I mean that PEAR_Warning would have a method that says "start >noticing non-fatal errors" and from this point on, any warning that is >registered through its monitoring of PEAR_ErrorStack *and* the use of >PEAR_Warning::add() (name is negotiable) would be simply placed into a >holding array. When the method that says "stop noticing non-fatal >errors" is called, a PEAR_Exception can easily be created with the >PEAR_Warning as a cause, and all of the warnings would be clearly and >easily delineated by where they came from. This would ultimately make >PEAR_ErrorStack only useful in the transition from php4 to php5, and >that was its original intent anyways :). > >In any case, I would appreciate it if people hold off on the standard >positive and negative critiques until they see the code I'm talking >about, it should be very short code. I will try to work on that as well this afternoon if I get a chance. Bertrand Mansion Mamasam