Re: Re: Image_Color named color
| From: | Ian Eure | Date: | Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:56:28 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Image_Color named color | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-33473@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Monday 20 September 2004 12:28 am, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Jesper Veggerby wrote:
> > Both seems to be used commonly, I think you can use both with an
> > e and an a (perhaps US vs UK?), but I would think you should be
> > consistent in your choice?
>
> I, too, would prefer consistent names but IIRC the original author of
> the Image_Color package used an "official" list of web-safe colors for
> both the color names and color values used in the namedColor2RGB()
> method.
>
Perhaps some sort of color mapping decorator class could be used; the default,
of course, being the current palette. This would allow for an X11 color[1]
map, etc.
Besides, the websafe palette is obsolete[2].
[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X11_Color_Names
[2]: http://www.seankenney.com/publications/2000-01/index.php
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature]
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature]