Re: config bug 2439

From: Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 04:52:39 +0000
Subject: Re: config bug 2439
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-33832@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Oct 13, 2004, at 11:42 PM, Alan Knowles wrote:
Normally you could work around that by using flag in the constructor, or something simple - try and avoid minor issues forcing BC breaks... I personally prefer to bunch the BC into a really major feature/implementation change, and remove all those kludges at that point.. Depends on how feasible the work around is..
I would say the workaround is quite kludgy. I agree with what Paul said, fixing this bug would probably bring the code inline with the original intent. However, what if someone's relying on the current, faulty behavior? -ryan
Regards Alan Ryan King wrote:
I have a bug I'm trying to deal with here: http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=2439 ... assuming you read the bug report.... Would this be considered a BC break? thanks, -ryan ------------------- "There are only the pursued, the pursuing, the busy and the tired." - The Great Gatsby http://theryanking.com
-- PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
------------------- "There are only the pursued, the pursuing, the busy and the tired." - The Great Gatsby http://theryanking.com

« previous php.pear.dev (#33832) next »