Re: Re: [PEPr] +1 for Web Services::Services_Delicious

From: Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 22:41:11 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: [PEPr] +1 for Web Services::Services_Delicious
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-34420@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi, Christian Weiske wrote:
So leave the fields for username and password blank. If anyone wants to use the package and it doesn't work, he has the *chance* to test it - if he uses it is a different question.
There are times, when the service is responding with in internal server error due to a very high load. How should unit tests cope with that. While I agree, that unit tests are a good thing, they are not suited for every package. We have rules, that they should be included in stable releases, but how do you test against a moving target. The tests are supposed to test the package, but it would be more like testing whether the service still responds the same way it did yesterday. There are plans to provide different versions of the service using different URLs. If this is available, it will make sense. Otherwise, it would be like testing wether 1+1 equals 2 while somebody is changing the law of mathematics.... Stephan -- http://www.php-tools.net http://www.schst.net http://pear.php.net

« previous php.pear.dev (#34420) next »