Re: unserialize() bottle-neck

From: Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 01:18:48 +0000
Subject: Re: unserialize() bottle-neck
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-35452@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
I found it much faster to spit out an array declaration and then use eval() to pull that data back in. I had about 500kb of data. --Wez. Lukas Smith wrote:
Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
Gz compression is turned off, so unserialize() eats 59,49 % of runtime. Have you ever encountered such optimization problems with serialize()/unserialize() ? I quite understand that unserializing a 150ko string (the index) into an array take some time, but how to optimize that ? Should I try to write my own (un)serializer ? What about using a binary format which would save disk space as well ? Any experiences welcome,
I remember Wez once saying that he either wrote a faster serialize() or unserialize() in PHP itself .. regards Lukas


« previous php.pear.dev (#35452) next »