Re: Re: pear install package failed with GD extension dependency

On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:11:31 -0800, Justin Patrin <papercrane@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 18:24:20 +0100, Laurent Laville > <pear@laurent-laville.org> wrote: > > Pierre-Alain Joye a écrit : > > > > > > Are you sure you try it using the same php configuration? > > > > > > For example, running pear from the php folder, without any php.ini > > > loaded and load phpinfo from your webserver? > > > > > > --Pierre > > > > Hello Pierre-Alain, > > > > With pear 1.3.1 (my previous version installed) i got only a warning > > message that keep me aware that extension was not installed, even if it > > was not TRUE. But i may install such package (image_color) without using > > the -n option of pear install. > > > > Now to install this package, i've of course used the -n option. > > > > Difference between my old config and the new one are : > > > > pear 1.3.1 => 1.3.4 > > php 4.3.9 with gd => php 4.3.10 with gd > > > > This is likely because your command-line version of PHP doesn't have > GD loaded whereas the web version does. Run phpinfo() from the > command-line PHP interpreter and see fi it says it has GD. I guest this the Laurent's php.ini problem, where the php.ini placed? C:\Windows\php.ini? Cause if running the command prompt PHP seem get the configuration from that file. I'm using WindowsXP box, but no problem with extension such GD, Image_Color-1.0.1 installed, cause i place php.ini at C:\Windows, but i place php.ini for webserver (Apache) at C:\Program Files\Apache Group\Apache. The PHP (PHP 4.3.10) installed at C:\Program Files\PHP4 -- .:: OrangEnigmA : Never Dreamt Before ::.