Re: PEAR_Server

I would definatly favour getting it into PEAR, but it's really a greg's decision. Maintaining a PEAR package can be quite time consuming, and developing outside of PEAR does free you up from some of the commitments. (i can attest from my akpear repo.) > > "Chiara_PEAR_Server will be phasing out use of DB_DataObject in favor of > Davey Shafik's Crtx_DB_DataObject, a data access class that uses PDO and is > E_STRICT PHP5" > I don't believe that this is really necessary. But if it really is, what > about moving Crtx_DB_DataObject to DB_DataObjects2? I had a quick look at this, at present, The core class only has a tertiary similarity to DataObjects, and misses alot of the lessons learned from DataObjects (It's adds alot of low use utility methods to the core class, and misses some of the key goals). DBDO is nearing it's alpha release, and would be a better target for API compatibility If anyone wants to attempt a DataObjects2 specifically for PHP5/PDO. Regards Alan > > "Chiara_PEAR_Server depends on Chiara_XML_RPC5" > Looks like a PHP5-only version of XML_RPC. What about XML_RPC2 in PEAR? > > "Some PEAR Group members don't like the name, it implies a direct connection > to pear.php.net" > Currently valid, but if PEAR_Server will be moved to PEAR this becomes invalid. > > What do you other pear-devs think about all that? Wouldn't it be a great > loss for PEAR not offering it's own server package? > > Regards, > Toby > [1] > > http://greg.chiaraquartet.net/archives/34-PEAR_Server-will-be-renamed-to-Chiara_PEAR_Server.html > -- > Tobias Schlitt GPG Key: 0xA6529579 > a passion for php > http://www.schlitt.info > Like to say "thank you"? - > http://pear.php.net/wishlist.php/toby >