Re: Re: Preferred way of generating XML in pear packages?

On Apr 5, 2005 11:05 AM, James Carr <james.r.carr@gmail.com> wrote: > Philippe, > > Currently I have a custom class I had used for some gateway > intergation I did for a few clients, basically all it does is send > auth transactions and returns the response as an array. Although I > have been toying with the idea of implementing the full feature set, > perhaps those should just be seperate packages? > It only really makes sense to make another package if you're going to implement features that Payment_Process doesn't. And even then it would be good to make a Payment_Process wrapper which allows use of your class from Payment_Process. > Thanks, > JC > > On Apr 5, 2005 5:51 PM, Philippe Jausions > <Philippe.Jausions@11abacus.com> wrote: > > James Carr wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm currently touching up my payfuse/clearcommerce package to submit > > > as a proposal, and I'm curious what is the preferred method of > > > generating XML in pear packages? I am currently using DOM, but am > > > wondering if I should shy away from it due to the differences in > > > implementation between php4 and php5? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > JC > > > > Hi JC, > > > > Please consider making a backend processor for Payment_Process package > > instead of creating a whole new package. > > > > -Philippe > > > > -- > > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > > -- > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Justin Patrin