Re: Wiki conversions

On 5/4/05, Nikolas 'Atrus' Coukouma <lists@atrus.org> wrote: > Justin Patrin wrote: > > >On 5/4/05, Nikolas 'Atrus' Coukouma <lists@atrus.org> wrote: > > > > > >>Justin Patrin wrote: > >> > >> > >>>I've made a preliminary TIkiWiki parser for Text_Wiki and CoWiki and > >>>DokuWiki renderers. You can see them in action here: > >>> > >>>http://pear.reversefold.com/wiki/index.php > >>> > >>>Is anyone interested in this? Should I bother creating CoWiki / > >>>DokuWIki parsers or a TikiWiki renderer? > >>> > >>> > >>It seems like these should just be rule sets for Text_Wiki. > >> > >> > > > >...and they are. How do you think I did it? I did mention that this is > >done using Text_Wiki. I copied the default Parse objects and altered > >them for Tiki and copied the Xhtml render objects and altered them for > >DokuWiki, then copied those for CoWiki. If you want to see the > >rulesets: > >http://pear.reversefold.com/Text/Wiki/ > > > > > I'm not sure what you're asking, then ("Should I bother creating ...?") > if you've already created it. Are you asking if they should be part of > Text_Wiki? A subpackage? in your own channel? > > The bundling with Text_Wiki seems like it should be up to the maintainer > (Paul Jones). I'm not sure if it's worth making a subpackage and putting > it in PEAR. I'd definitely suggest packaging it and putting it in your > own channel to make it easy to install. > I only made a TIki Parser and CoWiki and DokuWIki renderers. I'm asking if anyone would find it useful to have the rest (Tiki renderer, CoWiki and DokuWiki parsers). Also, I just want to know if anyone else would use any of this. I could put it in a channel of my own...but I don't really have a good place to host it right now. We'll see.... -- Justin Patrin