Re: Suggestions for package naming/split
| From: | Philippe Jausions | Date: | Tue, 05 Jul 2005 17:32:50 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Suggestions for package naming/split | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-38458@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Pablo Fischer wrote:
Hi, I'm writing some PHP classes that I want to submit/upload to PEAR (obviously, using PEPr, votes, etc..). These classes are focused in Debian, I'm currently splitting them in two parts: I can release a Debian_Utils package that will have both parts (User and Devel), but in the case of Debian_BTS it depends on another package (Mail[2] package) and the Devel classes depend on another package (File_Archive). So, my question is: is there any conventions for splitting packages? Should I split the packages by their dependencies so I should create many PEPr(s): Or should I create just one package (Debian_Utils) and add a lot of dependencies to it and don't care if a user needs to download Mail package also if Debian_BTS is not going to be used by the user?. Pablo [1] http://lintian.debian.org/I would say, split the package based on its usage... -Philippe