Re: New Proposal Questions

On 8/2/2005 7:57 AM, Arnaud Limbourg spake the following words: > Jean-Sebastien Goupil wrote: > >> Klaus Guenther wrote: >> >>> On 8/1/2005 7:58 PM, Jean-Sebastien Goupil spake the following words: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I created some projects and I'm wondering what are the advantages to >>>> transform them to pear package ... (the visibility ?) >>>> And I'm wondering what are the Licences that we can attach to... (free >>>> for personnal and charge for commercial ? is it possible ?) do you >>>> have >>>> a list ? >>>> I don't want to register (because I think it is human-approved) for >>>> nothing. >>> >>> You don't need to put them in PEAR to be able to distribute them as >>> PEAR >>> packages. Just set up your own channel server and distribute your own >>> packages. Horde, PAT and others are doing that already. And then you >>> can >>> use whatever license you like :) >>> >>> Klaus >> >> "Just set up your own channel server and distribute your own >> packages" >> MMM what do you mean (and how to do that) ? >> I currently distribute one of my own project on >> http://other.lookstrike.com/barcode/ >> Is the project will be displayed on pear website or not ? >> > The channels will be fully available when PEAR 1.4 hits the streets. > Klaus, keep in ming that everybody does not run alpha versions :) Of course :) I was just saying... Horde, e.g., doesn't have its own channel server last time I checked... Jean-Sebastien, all you need to do is to package your projects and provide people with links to the URLs. The only thing I'd suggest is that you prefix class names in your projects and place them in a directory of that name (if you don't place them in the web root) to prevent collisions with PEAR packages. Also, if you do that, you can use your own directory structure (though I definitely prefer the PEAR structure). Klaus