Re: cvs: pear /Text_Wiki/doc test_Text_Wiki.php

From: Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:13:09 +0000
Subject: Re: cvs: pear /Text_Wiki/doc test_Text_Wiki.php
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear.cvs php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-41082@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Bonjour, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
bertrand GUGGER wrote:
toggg        Tue Jan 24 19:08:33 2006 UTC
  Modified files:                  /pear/Text_Wiki/doc    test_Text_Wiki.php   Log:
  Added Ooo , Pdf and Docbook in renderers to be tested, would be better to have free input.
calling it OOo may not be ideal. OO.org supports many different formats .. sxw, fsxw, odf .. It's only a test thingie.
In fact, I only inserted Ooo as a reminder. As you know, this sub package is not even yet in "draft" state, so we have time to fix the name, but certainly Ooosxw could be a good candidate (even if that ears a little strange :) Anyway, for this test / demo script, I'm currently working out a much more enhanced cli/web application, which will show how rules are organized , from where come the parse/render classes, extract auto from the sources the various possible configurations and their default when applicable, and I hope, enable their input/modification and the registration of the produced test as a .phpt. Also, I think of enabling *any* parse/render name by associating some <input type="text"...> to the existing selects. Errmmm.... yes, it's perhaps too ambitious, but as Text_Wiki grows, we need much more performant tests. Thanks for your attention on Text_Wiki. Regards -- bertrand

« previous php.pear.dev (#41082) next »