Re: cvs: pear /Text_Wiki/doc test_Text_Wiki.php
| From: | bertrand Gugger | Date: | Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:13:09 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: cvs: pear /Text_Wiki/doc test_Text_Wiki.php | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.cvs php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-41082@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Bonjour,
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
bertrand GUGGER wrote:In fact, I only inserted Ooo as a reminder. As you know, this sub package is not even yet in "draft" state, so we have time to fix the name, but certainly Ooosxw could be a good candidate (even if that ears a little strange :) Anyway, for this test / demo script, I'm currently working out a much more enhanced cli/web application, which will show how rules are organized , from where come the parse/render classes, extract auto from the sources the various possible configurations and their default when applicable, and I hope, enable their input/modification and the registration of the produced test as a .phpt. Also, I think of enabling *any* parse/render name by associating some <input type="text"...> to the existing selects. Errmmm.... yes, it's perhaps too ambitious, but as Text_Wiki grows, we need much more performant tests. Thanks for your attention on Text_Wiki. Regards -- bertrandcalling it OOo may not be ideal. OO.org supports many different formats .. sxw, fsxw, odf .. It's only a test thingie.toggg Tue Jan 24 19:08:33 2006 UTCModified files: /pear/Text_Wiki/doc test_Text_Wiki.php Log: Added Ooo , Pdf and Docbook in renderers to be tested, would be better to have free input.