Re: Re: cvs: peardoc /en/core archive.xml

----- Original Message ----- From: "Alexander Merz" <alexander.merz@s1999.tu-chemnitz.de> To: "Vincent Blavet" <vincent@blavet.net>; <pear-dev@lists.php.net> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 11:10 AM Subject: Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: [PEAR-CVS] cvs: peardoc /en/core archive.xml > > thanks for the Archive_Tar documentation, I did start the work of > > documentation but you are quicker than me ! I will complete the doc with > Edit the STATUS file to avoid such situation. Yes I know, this is my fault ... > > > I did put the Archive_Tar release in the File Category (package manager > > part). > Where is this in the peardoc directory? > > No it is on the package browsing part. I think the doc and the package browsing organization of pearweb, must respect the same structure. The Archive_Tar will be distributed with the core PEAR code (because it is used by the package manager scripts), but will be developped as a 'standard' package (pear/ CVS tree and not php4/pear/ CVS tree). So the first time I declare the package in pearweb, I did it with the Category 'File'. I think it should now be in the same structure as the doc (under 'PEAR' Category). The other solution is to put the doc under the 'File' Category. That was my first idea, before I see that Archive was declared in the core 'STATUS' file. Thanks, Vincent