Re: The RPCBlogging package

From: Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 01:59:33 +0000
Subject: Re: The RPCBlogging package
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-41884@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 3/19/06, Anant Narayanan <anant@kix.in> wrote: > Hello All, > > > It could be optionally dependant on both of them. It would make more > > sense to have a Blogging package IMHO which just connects in different > > ways. > > I agree. A single blogging package that could talk to any kind of > blogging server is what we need. Here's what I propose: > > 1) First create an XML_Atom package, since there is no implementation of > the Atom API in PEAR currently. Like XML_RPC, this package will have > more wider applications than just blogging. > > 2) Then make XML_RPC and XML_Atom optional dependencies for Services_Blog.. > > 3) Two sets of drivers for Services_Blog, the first set uses RPC, and > the second uses Atom. > > I'd also like to know if anyone is working / had worked on implementing > the Atom API as a package in PEAR. > There were some feed reader and writer packages...I don't recall if they are in yet or not. Check the proposal list. -- Justin Patrin

« previous php.pear.dev (#41884) next »