Re: [Fwd: Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: [PEAR-CVS] cvs: pear /Services_JSON JSON.php Test-JSON.php]
| From: | bertrand Gugger | Date: | Sat, 08 Apr 2006 00:49:03 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: [PEAR-CVS] cvs: pear /Services_JSON JSON.php Test-JSON.php] | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-42150@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
And before Pierre stops me:
I voted +1 , we were 8 to do so , 3 were with conditions , not obviously about the name.
Dan and I comented the commit.
Pierre controled.
Regards
--
toggg
bertrand Gugger wrote:
> How you can present things
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: [PEAR-CVS] cvs: pear /Services_JSON
> JSON.php Test-JSON.php
> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:50:49 +0100
> From: toggg@php.net (bertrand Gugger)
> Reply-To: toggg@php.net
> To: Daniel Convissor <danielc@analysisandsolutions.com>
> CC: Michal Migurski <migurski@php.net>, pear-cvs@lists.php.net,
> PEAR Dev List <pear-dev@lists.php.net>, PEAR QA List
> <pear-qa@lists.php.net>
> Newsgroups: php.pear.cvs,php.pear.dev,php.pear.qa
> References: <cvsmigurski1143179864@cvsserver>
> <20060324154010.GA1212@panix.com>
>
> Bonjour,
> Daniel Convissor wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 05:57:44AM -0000, Michal Migurski wrote:
>>
>>
>>> migurski Fri Mar 24 05:57:44 2006 UTC
>>>
>>> Added files: /pear/Services_JSON JSON.php
>>> Test-JSON.php
>>
>>
>> Cool. Glad to see this getting into CVS!
>>
>> Three of the votes for this package expressed reservations with
>> putting this package being in the Services category:
>>
>> http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id=198&handle=wenz
>> http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id=198&handle=justinpatrin
>> http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id=198&handle=bolk
>>
>> I share those reservations. Perhaps put it in the Text or HTML
>> categories? Please, a consensus on where to put this should be
>> reached before the first release.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --Dan
>>
>>
>>
> I was also happy to see this commit.
> Congrats Michal !
>
> As for other classes,
> I really like to see client executable code included.
>
> For the category,
> if javascript belongs to html , then HTML category.
> That should be, as javascript belongs to public.
> Just not the server of it.
>
> I would add a call for a new role by pear installer , client script , as
> javascript
>
> Should be in some public area.
>
> Regards