package.xml 2.0 install method problem

FYI, I'm the package maintainer of Net_Sieve and I'm also the FreeBSD port maintainer of it. I'm having a problem getting Net_Sieve to install properly on FreeBSD when using the package.xml 2.0 format. The package.xml is in the 2.0 format and "pear install" and "pear uninstall" work fine as per the PEAR release procedure. The problem is that FreeBSD uses "pear install -r package.xml" to install the package. The procedure on FreeBSD: - Download package file - Verify the MD5 and SHA256 checksums of the downloaded file against the locally saved checksums. - Extract the package files - run "pear install -r package.xml" on the extracted package files Also all of the above is handled by FreeBSD's php/pear install infrastructure, so what the port part that I maintain pretty much just specifies the file to download and the checksums. This seems to generate an incorrect net_sieve.reg file. I can't seem to figure out where the problem exists. My feeling is that the "pear install -r package.xml" isn't valid for 2.0 version files. I have attached a diff of a good net_sieve.reg (pear install) vs. a bad net_sieve.reg (pear install -r). Any suggestions? -- Anish Mistry amistry@am-productions.biz AM Productions http://am-productions.biz/

Attachment: [text/x-diff] net_sieve.reg.diff
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature]