Re: practical concerns for moving PEAR forward

From: Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:52:15 +0000
Subject: Re: practical concerns for moving PEAR forward
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-44145@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
i propose myself as a dev for the website although i will help in anything if needed thx On 9/28/06, Ian Warner <iwarner@triangle-solutions.com> wrote:
Hi, Seems to be that a major issue with the PearWeb is its ties with the php.net CVS system. 1. Whats stopping PEAR breaking away from php.net CVS. And setting up on a new server with SVN powering it? The newer PEAR members such as myself maybe need educating on this. To create the new PEAR 2.0 what positions need to be filled, if this can be outlined then the team can be assembled and I think communicate via some WIKI / TRAC / Ticket system. Its all well and good on the Email list but ideas get lost, forgotten, a central place to discuss and update would be better, snapshots of this can then be posted onto the email list to educate PEAR community and prompt them to comment. A position would be made for someone to organise and edit these posts perhaps. If all these roles can be given a job description as someone pointed out then it would help. Developer x 3 Designer x 1 DB Admin x 1 Server Admin x 1 Docs Admin x 1 Maillist Admin x 1 Wiki/Trac... Moderator x 2 SEO moderator x 1 etc etc... Would it be possible / sensible ? just to port the whole PEAR web onto a more static WIKI interface, PEAR is similar to http://commons.wikimedia.org/ and with MediaWiki it is possible to extend the application in many ways to create more dynamic content where needed. Each package owner then has control over there package content (style will need to be controlled through templates) A Category leader would monitor and makes changes to the category page. Can the Wiki within PEAR be adapted to fullfill this role? Regards Ian Warner Director Triangle Solutions Ltd Greg Beaver wrote: Hi all, As a follow-up to my previous message on abstract ideas, I would like to point out some practical concerns from my experience working on both PEAR and phpDocumentor. First off, doing a complete rewrite of pearweb from scratch throwing everything out and starting over is impractical, and will simply lead to nothing getting done. PEAR has 409 packages at the moment, and this is no accident: more than 1 thing in PEAR really works well. Sure, we have some problems that need fixing, but let's avoid introducing new ones. Those who want to help redesign the PEAR project need to understand a few things: PEAR is pear.php.net. pear.php.net gets approximately 800,000 hits/day, and our mysql database is HUGE. Any minor change can severely affect performance, and even bring down the whole site (API docs generation, for instance). pearweb was designed when PHP 4 was new, and takes advantage of several weird PHP tricks, such as a auto-prepend and an auto-append file, and it also relies upon mod_rewrite in apache. In addition, all downloads pass through a PHP file named "get" which masquerades as a directory. pearweb has a huge number of dependencies, all on PHP 4-based packages. In addition, it was designed monolithically, so internally everything depends on everything else. Making a change in one place can have an unexpected effect on random places in the website. All of the ideas on changing political structures of package categories or groups will have a significant impact on the infrastructure of the website itself. Before we can make *any* changes to pearweb (and hence, any political changes), we will need to refactor the site to be much more efficient and streamlined. Rather than make a huge rewrite, I would like to see a few big changes done incrementally. First is making it possible for people to install the thing locally quite easily, and hence this means making it PEAR-installable. Next is de-coupling code so that changes in one location don't affect others, and simplifying the code structure so that it is even possible to make changes. Finally, it will be ready to make changes. None of this work is sexy, but the result will be. Believe me, I'm all for a frank discussion of PEAR's political structure, but I would like the result to be implementable in this century, if possible, at pear.php.net :) Greg -- PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
-- David Coallier, Founder & Software Architect, Agora Production (http://agoraproduction.com) 51.42.06.70.18

« previous php.pear.dev (#44145) next »