Re: [PEPr] Changes in proposal for RFC::Proposed PEARWEB Changes

Mark Wiesemann wrote: > Hi, > > Mark Wiesemann wrote: >> Gregory Beaver wrote: >>> I don't see any bugs, perhaps there's something I missed? >> I think the numbers shown in the graph are wrong, see here: >> http://pear.php.net/package-stats.php?cid=27&pid=306 >> >> The "1" in the graph for October is obviously not right (0.7.2 was >> released yesterday and had 52 downloads so far). >> >> And the 810 for Structures_DataGrid on this page >> >> http://pear.php.net/package-stats.php?cid=27&pid=&rid=&submit=Go >> seems to be number of downloads from version 0.4.1 (c.p. the first link) >> >> And another one: Go to the first link, select release 0.7.2 in the >> select box on the bottom, select a color, click "Add" and "Update >> graph". Now the graph shows 88 downloads (while the table states 52 >> downloads). > > After having another look at [1] I noticed two new (but related) issues: > - for release 0.4 it shows "1999-11-30 05:00 UTC" as the date of the > last download (but the release was on 2004-03-16) > - selecting 0.7.2 and 0.4 in the "Show graph of" box, gives for 0.7.2 > 109 downloads (while the table states 73 and the single graph states 88, > cp. my mail from yesterday, and more obvious: [2]) > > Regards, > Mark > > [1] http://pear.php.net/package-stats.php?cid=27&pid=306 > [2] > http://pear.php.net/package-stats.php?cid=27&pid=306&rid=3607 Hi Mark, The stats for the graphs and the stats for the lists are kept in separate tables, and so there are likely to be small differences in download stats between the two. Obviously there is something weird about the stats for 0.4, I'll have to investigate. Most likely the stats in the graph are more accurate, so I might just massage the data in the table-based. If anyone finds other examples, please post, and when I have time I'll fix them. Greg