Re: New Proposal Draft - Log_xml - Need advice about 'links' section
| From: | Mark Wiesemann | Date: | Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:47:50 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: New Proposal Draft - Log_xml - Need advice about 'links' section | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-45423@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Michael,
Michael Gower wrote:
> I have a new package, Log_xml, and am unsure how the 'links' part of PEPr
> works. I have my entire source code hosted at code.google.com with
> subversion but there isn't a 'svn' option for the links. Should I list
> every php file individually (as phps)?
(IMHO:) It's fine the way you did it. No need for linking every file, as
such links are only click away.
> Also according to the 'New Mainters Guide' I should be initiating a
> discussion about the package, I hope this does it.
You could have also switched to "Proposal" stage instead of writing to
the list. This would have triggered an automated email to the pear-dev
list and people could comment on it via the comments form.
> Feel free to take a look (it's up to PEAR coding standards, etc).
There are some spacing issues like "if( !$creating" or "if (isset(
$conf['schema'] )) {".
But the most important question is: Have you contacted Jon Parise, the
maintainer of the Log package. If you don't insist of having your own
Log_XML package, he might want to include your driver into his package.
Regards,
Mark