Re: QA weekly bug summary
| From: | Mark Wiesemann | Date: | Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:26:09 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: QA weekly bug summary | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-45869@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Gregory Beaver wrote:
> Another very good idea is hidden in your mail, which is to say having
> patch notifications sent to pear-qa, so that everyone can see when a bug
> has a fix attached to it.
I haven't tried to use this patch feature, but it was often requested to
have a possibility to attach some *code* to a bug or feature request.
Note the word *code*: it includes not only patches, but, for example,
also longer code snippets that show how a bug can be reproduced. Sending
an email to pear-qa makes IMO only sense for real patches, and in this
case also not for actively maintained packages. If somebody sends a
patch for one of the packages that I (co-)maintain, he can be sure that
gets at least an answer or that I apply the patch.
Therefore, an easy solution might be to use the "unmaintained" flag: if
it is set, and a patch (or some code) is attached to a bug, then an
email could be send to pear-qa. This has only the disadvantage that not
every unmaintained package is marked as unmaintained.
Regards,
Mark
--
http://www.markwiesemann.eu